Academic Research

Finite-mathematics proofs, specified deterministic computation, and interpretive research on the ASH Model (reference implementation v1.1.0)

Paper Status

“Adinkra-Stabilized Hypercube Model: Canonical Algebra, Mapping Semantics, and Controlled Simulations” by James Daley (v1.1.0, June 2026). An exploratory finite-mathematics and computational-ontology framework: it proves the finite algebra and validates deterministic mapping semantics; the procedural-cosmology reading is an interpretive hypothesis, not an empirically validated cosmology. The earlier Figshare preprint (“Procedural Cosmology in 9 Dimensions”) is superseded by this v1.1.0 audit-remediation release.

References

  • Faux & Gates (2005)Adinkra graphs for SUSY representation theory
  • Doran et al. (2007)Graph-theoretic adinkra identifications
  • Almheiri et al. (2015)Quantum error correction in AdS/CFT
  • Green & Schwarz (1984)Anomaly cancellation in D=10
  • Polchinski (1998)String Theory
  • Cohn et al. (2019)E8 and Leech lattice optimality

Future Directions

Quantum Amplitudes

Exploring whether the classical, discrete finite-state framework could be extended toward quantum probability amplitudes — an open research direction, not a current capability.

Richer SUSY Multiplets

Expanding the finite Adinkra/Garden-algebra construction (the N=8 layer built from the punctured [8,4,4] code) toward extended supersymmetry representations.

Tensor Networks

Representing the finite hypercube dynamics in a tensor-network formalism.

Dimensional Studies

Comparative analysis in 8D/10D to explore how the finite construction behaves in adjacent dimensions — noting that self-duality holds only for the punctured [8,4,4] code, not in nine dimensions, so nine bits is a versioned modeling choice (8 measurement coordinates + 1 recomputed XOR-parity bit), not a privileged status.

Scientific status

ASH is an exploratory finite-mathematics and computational-ontology framework (reference implementation v1.1.0). Its claims fall into three tiers: proved finite mathematics, specified deterministic computation, and interpretive research hypotheses. It is not an empirically validated theory of physics, cosmology, or consciousness — it does not derive a Friedmann equation, spacetime metric, dark energy, or the CMB, does not establish that its branching realizes quantum measurement, and has no confirmed observational predictions. The five Axioms of Existence are interpretive postulates, not established laws.